Cloud Computing and Current Solutions †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Cloud Computing and Current Solutions. Answer: Introduction In information technology the number of threats and the organisational risk factors are increasing day by day. It is seen that the organisations are facing lots of risks and threats from both inside and outside of the organisation (Aldunce et al., 2015). There are also various types of risks present in an organisation on the basis of the nature. Natural calamities like storm and earthquake can also lead to the organisation risk factors. Hacking, malware and virus are also reasons of the security issues. There are many differences between the risk and the uncertainty. VIC government has provided a list or guidance of regulations which can make the system more advanced in terms of security. In this report the risk factors are discussed in details with a diagram. The risk management methods and regulations of the VIC government are also discussed in the following discussions of the report. Explanation of the diagram and identification of different levels of risk exposure. The diagram explains the structure of the flow of the factors in an organization. It has also provided an outline about risk management regulations of the VIC government. There are many factors of making the system vulnerable. Most of the factors are dependent upon various risks and threats. In the diagram all the possible threats are given in accordance with their place and moment of occurrence (Becken Hughey, 2013). The risks are classified into two parts. One is the internal risks and the other is the external risks for the organization. The internal risks are generated due to various issues regarding the internal functioning of the organization. Another important factor is that the organization has many possible ways of creating threats and uncertainties by itself (Bianco et al., 2017). The internal risk factors can also be divided into two parts and those are deliberate threat and accidental threat. In case of accidental threats the cause is not due to individuals action. Accidental risk factors are caused due to several causes like power loss and lack of internet connection and many more. These factors are only considered inside the organization. In case of deliberate threats the reasons behind the threats are generated due to individual motive. In case of organizational risk the people who are working in the organization make cause threats and risk factors into the system of the organization so that the organization faces difficulties and loss of productivity. Unauthorized access, data loss and intrusion can be c onsidered as the problems regarding the functioning of the possible risk factors inside the organization (Brindley, 2017). Data breach can also be an important factor that can be used by the employees of the organization to harm it. Another type of risk is the external risk. External risk can occur due to the reasons initiated externally from the organizations. This type of risk factors is the most common risk factors. Hackers and other unwanted access are always making various kinds of risks to the system of the organization. Risks can also be divided into two parts according to the nature of the risk factors. The risk factors can be also determined by the nature of the risks. One is environmental risk and the other is human made risks (Chance Brooks, 2015). The environmental risks factors are also important in case of making the system more vulnerable. Natural disasters like earthquake, storm and sudden temperature change of the environment can cause a big damage to the system. I n the right most side of the diagram the risk management steps are shown as per the VIC government rules and regulations. To decrease the risk factors first the risk should be identified properly so that it can be fought properly. Then the mitigation of the risk factors is done by decreasing the reasons behind the risks. In case information technology the ICT security risks are also important factor (Davies, 2014). There are also many layers presenty in the risks management system. The main thing is that the risks must be clearly understood from the point of effect it can reach. Several risks are given various levels with respect to their vulnerability. These levels can be divided into three parts. Those are high, medium and low risk respectively. The main effects of the risks, which are also the main factors for the failure of organisations functioning, lead to several damages (DeAngelo Stulz, 2015). Those risks which lead to the failure of most of the organisations functioning an d also very vulnerable in terms of making the system endangered are known as the high risk factors. Examples of such risks are hacking, intrusion, failure of the total power system of the organisation. These types of risk factors are also important in case of making the system more vulnerable and also the source of these risks can be both internal and external with respect to the organisation (Ferguson at al., 2013). The natural risks like earthquake, storm is also considered to be high risk factors for the organisations. Medium level risks are data loss of the servers. This kind of data loss is also important in case of making the organisational background more vulnerable and also the importance of the risk factors is of medium nature (Glendon, Clarke McKenna, 2016). Sudden power loss and sudden loss of network connections are also considered to be low risk factors for the organisation. These risk factors should also be given equal priority in case of solving them and also these r isk factors are to be solved with respect to the organisational point of view. Comparison between Deliberate and Accidental Threats and ranking of threats according to the importance Threats are created by different types of reasons which can be divided in two different ways. These are deliberate threats and accidental threats. The deliberate threats are those which are created by intention by individuals or group of individuals (Heazle et al., 2013). Deliberate threats can be from the inside or from the outside of the organisation. In case of deliberate threats external deliberate threats are hacking, intrusion and data loss of the organisation by some external people. The access of the unwanted people can lead to the threats which are also very important in case of making the deliberate one (Holt, Smirnova, Chua Copes, 2015). The main aim of the risk management process is to cancel out the deliberate threats. Deliberate threats can be considered as the high level risk factors for the organisations. As the information of the public is the most important thing in information technology market, it is given the highest priority (Tadeusiewicz Horzyk, 2014). Hackin g and data intrusion can be big risk factors for the public information. These kinds of risks are also referred to high level risk factors. From that point of view of the organisation is responsible for the risks which are caused internally as the deliberate threats are also caused from the inside of the organisation. In case of organisational risks the main source of the risks are the data loss by the employees which are also considered as deliberate threats. These kinds of deliberate threats are of highest priority also (Hopkin, 2017). Another type of risks is the accidental risk factor as the risk factor is caused by uncontrolled reasons. Environmental and natural risks are of this type. This type of risks is of both high and low priority. As the risk factors which are caused by the natural disasters like earthquake and storms, are considered to be the high risk factors. Also the risk factors like sudden power cut and the loss of internet connection are considered to be of relati vely low risk factors. Explanation of the challenges of VIC government regarding the internal and external risk management The IT risk management is a challenging task for the organisation in case of making the organisations free from the reasons which causes vulnerabilities to the system (Reason, 2016). It is already discussed that the risks can be of two types and those are respectively internal and external risk factors. In case of risk management the risk factors are also managed by the organisation in such a way that there are two different methods for dealing with the internal and external risks. The patterns of the internal risks are completely different from that of the external risk factors (Howard Beasley, 2017). In case of internal risk factors the employees of the organisations are sometimes liable for that. In that case the organisations should be very strict with the employees. The main actions that can be taken by the organisation administration should be in such a way that the internal risks are demolished from the organisation (Howes et al., 2015). The advantage in case of the internal risk factor is that the organisation has the control on the risk factors. In case of the external risk factors the reasons behind the risks cannot be controlled. The organisation should be more careful and constructive in case of external risk management (Kettl, 2015). The main advantage of the external risk factor is that it can be caused not intentionally sometimes. For that reason the organisation should be more technically sounded for opposing the risk factors. There are lots of differences between the risk and uncertainty. Risks are those which actually happen due to predefined reasons (Lam, 2014). The uncertainties cannot be understood previously. The main advantages of the risk analysis are that the reasons behind any risks are already known to the organisation. The risks can be controlled by taking previous precautions on the basis of the nature of the risks (Lawrence et al., 2015). In case of the uncertainties the main disadvantage is that the precautions cannot be taken previously as the reasons behind the uncertainties are not known. The time of happening of the risks can also predefined but the time and duration of the uncertainties can never be understood previously. The main advantage of making the risk management in a proper way, is to make the system secure. Discussion and evaluation of several methods available to the VIC government for risk management In this part of the report the risk management methods are discussed in details. The VIC government has created lots of methods that will help to create the system more secure. The VIC governments have also created many rules and regulations which should be followed in order to make the system fight the risk factors (McNeil, Frey Embrechts, 2015). The main advantage of making the risk management procedures are that the organisations can rely on the standards in case of opposing the risk factors. VIC government has created many laws and protocols for risk management. The first one is the privacy and data protection act 2014 (Paton et al., 2014). The Victorian protective data security framework is also designed to make the system secure. The main features of the security acts are making the framework, issuing the framework and then to monitor and regime the data security frameworks related to the organisations. The public sector data and the protective data security acts are also impo rtant in case of making the system more secured. In this case same features are also taken in order to implement the laws in proper way (Poniszewska-Mara?da, 2014). The primary step of this law is to develop and documenting the security framework. Then the standards, policies and the guidelines are also designed to make the system more secure. Compliance should also be delivered in order to overcome the risk factors. The information access should be also followed properly in order to make the system more secure and to overcome the risks. The security requirements should also be monitored properly and the reasons should be understood properly. Security awareness and training should be provided more so that the organisations can deal with such employees and public who are reliable enough to access the system securely. The service providers should be contracted so that the security is ensured (Pritchard PMP, .2014). The government rules and regulations should also be followed properly . Information value is also an important factor in case of making the system more secured with respect to the organisations. The security should be provided according to the value of the information. The organisations also follow the regulations in Case of sharing the information with other organisations. Conclusion From the above discussion it is concluded that several organisations face a lot of risk factors and to make the information secured all the regulations which are made by the VIC government, should be followed properly. Public personal information is the most important data from the security point of view. Organisations give public information the highest priority. The main advantage making the system more secured is that the public reliability is increased on the organisation and also the quality of the service is better. To overcome all the risk factors it is also important to identify all the risks and to understand the reasons behind the possible risks. It is also understood that there is a basic difference between the risk and the uncertainties as the risk can be controlled but the uncertainties cannot be controlled and mitigated. All the challenges which are faced by the VIC government in case of making the risk management regulations are also discussed with respect to the inter nal and the external risks. References Aldunce, P., Beilin, R., Howden, M., Handmer, J. (2015). Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: Practitioners frames and practices. Global Environmental Change, 30, 1-11. American Diabetes Association. (2016). 8. Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes care, 39(Supplement 1), S60-S71. Becken, S., Hughey, K. F. (2013). Linking tourism into emergency management structures to enhance disaster risk reduction. Tourism Management, 36, 77-85. Bianco, R. J., Arnoux, P. J., Wagnac, E., Mac-Thiong, J. M., Aubin, C. . (2017). Minimizing pedicle screw pullout risks: a detailed biomechanical analysis of screw design and placement. Clinical spine surgery, 30(3), E226-E232. Brindley, C. (Ed.). (2017). Supply chain risk. Taylor Francis. Chance, D. M., Brooks, R. (2015). Introduction to derivatives and risk management. Cengage Learning. Cole, S., Gin, X., Tobacman, J., Topalova, P., Townsend, R., Vickery, J. (2013). Barriers to household risk management: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), 104-135. Davies, J. C. (2014). Comparing environmental risks: tools for setting government priorities. Routledge. DeAngelo, H., Stulz, R. M. (2015). Liquid-claim production, risk management, and bank capital structure: Why high leverage is optimal for banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 219-236. Ferguson, B. C., Brown, R. R., Frantzeskaki, N., de Haan, F. J., Deletic, A. (2013). The enabling institutional context for integrated water management: Lessons from Melbourne. Water research, 47(20), 7300-7314. Glendon, A. I., Clarke, S., McKenna, E. (2016). Human safety and risk management. Crc Press. Heazle, M., Tangney, P., Burton, P., Howes, M., Grant-Smith, D., Reis, K., Bosomworth, K. (2013). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: An incremental approach to disaster risk management in Australia. Environmental Science Policy, 33, 162-170. Holt, T. J., Smirnova, O., Chua, Y. T., Copes, H. (2015). Examining the risk reduction strategies of actors in online criminal markets. Global Crime, 16(2), 81-103. Hopkin, P. (2017). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. Howard, D. L., Beasley, L. M. (2017). Pregnant with a perforated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and visible threads at the cervical os. BMJ Case Reports, 2017, bcr-2017. Howes, M., Tangney, P., Reis, K., Grant-Smith, D., Heazle, M., Bosomworth, K., Burton, P. (2015). Towards networked governance: improving interagency communication and collaboration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(5), 757-776. Kettl, D. F. (2015). The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 219-229. Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise risk management: from incentives to controls. John Wiley Sons. Lawrence, J., Sullivan, F., Lash, A., Ide, G., Cameron, C., McGlinchey, L. (2015). Adapting to changing climate risk by local government in New Zealand: institutional practice barriers and enablers. Local Environment, 20(3), 298-320. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton university press. Paton, D., Johnston, D., Mamula-Seadon, L., Kenney, C. M. (2014). Recovery and development: perspectives from New Zealand and Australia. In Disaster and development (pp. 255-272). Springer International Publishing. Poniszewska-Mara?da, A. (2014). Selected aspects of security mechanisms for cloud computingcurrent solutions and development perspectives. Pritchard, C. L., PMP, P. R. (2014). Risk management: concepts and guidance. CRC Press. Reason, J. (2016). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge. Tadeusiewicz, R., Horzyk, A. (2014, November). Man-Machine Interaction Improvement by Means of Automatic Human Personality Identification. In IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management (pp. 278-289). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.